AMD FirePro W7000 versus AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W7000 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W7000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 3.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.472 versus 69.23
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 June 2012 versus 31 January 2012 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 versus 69.23 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3699 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 89.6 GTexel / s versus 76 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1280
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,867 gflops versus 2,432 gflops
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 versus 17788
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.74 versus 52.467
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1177.395 versus 1148.367
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.685 versus 4.886
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 343.81 versus 268.49
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 versus 6475
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 versus 6475
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 89.6 GTexel / s versus 76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,867 gflops versus 2,432 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 versus 17788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 versus 52.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 versus 1148.367 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 versus 4.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 versus 268.49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 versus 6475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 versus 6475 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro W7000 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4255 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17788 | 82144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.467 | 63.74 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 | 1177.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.886 | 5.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 | 69.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 | 343.81 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6475 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6475 | 7988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro W7000 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 13 June 2012 | 31 January 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $449 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 502 | 503 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,432 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 76 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 4,313 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 153.6 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro W7000 avec des autres
AMDFirePro W7000 vs
ATIFireGL V7350
AMDFirePro W7000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300 SE
AMDFirePro W7000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
AMDFirePro W7000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 270
AMDFirePro W7000 vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q
AMDFirePro W7000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
