AMD Radeon 520 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 520 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 520
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1030 MHz versus 914 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20.60 GTexel/s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 1000 or 2500 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 versus 9744
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 13 March 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1030 MHz versus 914 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.60 GTexel/s versus 44.96 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 1000 or 2500 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 versus 9744 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 1030 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 320
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 660 GFLOPs
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 versus 865
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 versus 203
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 versus 1182
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 versus 1182
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 1242
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 1242
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 1030 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 versus 320 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops versus 660 GFLOPs |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2577 versus 865 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 versus 203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 versus 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 versus 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 865 | 2577 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 | 9744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1182 | 4148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1182 | 4148 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1242 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1242 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Oland | GM107 |
Conception | Radeon 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 1st Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1109 | 797 |
Genre | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1030 MHz | 914 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 660 GFLOPs | 1,439 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.60 GTexel/s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 20 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 48 GB/s | 32 or 80 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 1000 or 2500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 or GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |