AMD Radeon E8870 versus AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E8870 and AMD Radeon R9 390 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E8870
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 3.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 275 Watt
- 6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 versus 3708
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 versus 3353
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 versus 3708
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 versus 3353
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 September 2015 versus 18 June 2015 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 versus 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 versus 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 160.0 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 768
- 3.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,120 gflops versus 1,536 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8934 versus 3368
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 708
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 120.267 versus 36.948
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 versus 874.689
- 10x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.097 versus 1.11
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10445 versus 4620
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10445 versus 4620
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 160.0 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 768 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,120 gflops versus 1,536 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8934 versus 3368 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 708 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 versus 36.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 versus 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 versus 1.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 versus 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 versus 4620 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8870
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon E8870 | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 | 8934 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 | 800 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | 120.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | 3164.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 | 11.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4620 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4620 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 | 3353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3958 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon E8870 | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Saturn | Grenada |
Date de sortie | 29 September 2015 | 18 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 297 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops | 5,120 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2560 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 6,200 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 384 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 512 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |