AMD Radeon RX 480 versus AMD Radeon E8870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 480 and AMD Radeon E8870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 480
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1120 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 182.3 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 6000 MHz
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8629 versus 3368
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 778 versus 708
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 103.851 versus 36.948
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.593 versus 1.11
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11172 versus 4620
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11172 versus 4620
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 versus 29 September 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 768 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 6000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8629 versus 3368 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 versus 708 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 versus 36.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 versus 1.11 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 versus 4620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 versus 4620 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E8870
- 264.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 874.689 versus 769.541
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 versus 3719
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 versus 3361
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 versus 3719
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 versus 3361
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 5.8 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 versus 769.541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 versus 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 versus 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 versus 3361 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 480
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD Radeon E8870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8629 | 3368 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 778 | 708 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39057 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 103.851 | 36.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 769.541 | 874.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.593 | 1.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 67.879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11172 | 4620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 5030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 18191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11172 | 4620 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 5030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 18191 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4164 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 480 | AMD Radeon E8870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Ellesmere | Saturn |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 29 June 2016 | 29 September 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 340 | 341 |
| Prix maintenant | $299.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 39.12 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1266 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 36 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1120 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5.8 TFLOPs | 1,536 gflops |
| GPU Power | 110 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 768 |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 182.3 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 2,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | n / a | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 480 avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800S
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
AMDRadeon E8870
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
AMDRadeon RX 480 vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
