AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 823 MHz
- Environ 9% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 57.6 GTexel / s versus 52.7 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 896 versus 384
- Environ 70% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,150 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 170 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 4008 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 versus 31.935
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 versus 539.966
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 versus 2.344
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 versus 35.841
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 versus 64.308
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 versus 4184
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3333
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 versus 4184
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 versus 25 January 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 823 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.6 GTexel / s versus 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 4008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 versus 31.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 versus 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 versus 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 versus 35.841 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 versus 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 versus 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 versus 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 2344
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 2344
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 2344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 2344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | 31.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | 539.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | 2.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | 35.841 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | 64.308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | 4184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3333 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3063 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10721 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 | 25 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 796 | 799 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Prix maintenant | $138 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.6 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe avec des autres
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1200
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
