AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 811 MHz
- Environ 51% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 41% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,150 gflops versus 1,530 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 3.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 versus 29.528
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 versus 731.755
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 versus 2.486
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 versus 42.15
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 versus 87.659
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 versus 4133
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3331
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 versus 4133
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3331
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 811 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops versus 1,530 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 versus 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 versus 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 versus 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 versus 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 versus 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 versus 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 versus 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 63.76 GTexel / s versus 57.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 896
- Environ 7% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 80 Watt
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 2344
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 2344
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s versus 57.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 896 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 80 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 2344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 2344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3331 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2794 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8652 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 852 | 854 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 811 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops | 1,530 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.6 GTexel / s | 63.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe avec des autres
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDROG Ally Extreme
