AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 811 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,530 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 29.528
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 731.755
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 2.486
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 42.15
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 87.659
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 4133
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3331
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 4133
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3331
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 30 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 811 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 1,530 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 vs 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 vs 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 vs 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 vs 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 vs 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 vs 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 vs 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3331 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 960 vs 896
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 2344
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 2344
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 63.76 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 896 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 2344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 2344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | 29.528 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | 731.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | 2.486 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | 42.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | 87.659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | 4133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3331 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2794 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8652 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Baffin | GK106 |
| Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 30 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 852 | 854 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
| Price now | $177.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 811 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 1,530 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
| Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 63.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe with others
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
ATIMobility Radeon X600
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe vs
AMDROG Ally Extreme
