AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 81% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 601 MHz
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 57.6 GTexel / s versus 48.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 86% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,150 gflops versus 1,154 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 2800 MHz
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 versus 10.054
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 versus 544.601
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 versus 1.46
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 versus 22.103
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 versus 36.553
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 versus 3855
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 versus 3855
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 versus 1 June 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 601 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.6 GTexel / s versus 48.08 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops versus 1,154 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 2800 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 versus 10.054 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 versus 544.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 versus 1.46 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 versus 22.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 versus 36.553 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 versus 3855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 versus 3855 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 960 versus 896
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 versus 2344
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 versus 3357
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 versus 2344
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 versus 3357
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 960 versus 896 |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4957 versus 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4957 versus 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 versus 3357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | 10.054 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | 544.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | 1.46 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | 22.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | 36.553 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | 3855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | 4957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 4470 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | 3855 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | 4957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 4470 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1947 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5827 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Baffin | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 27 September 2016 | 1 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 852 | 855 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 601 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,150 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 57.6 GTexel / s | 48.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.0 GB / s | 89.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |