AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 48.08 GTexel / s
• Around 86% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 10.054
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 544.601
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 1.46
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 22.103
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 36.553
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 3855
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 3855

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• Around 7% higher pipelines: 960 vs 896
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 2344
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3357
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 2344
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.281 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.276 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.951 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.944 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	196.307 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 4470

Compare specifications (specs)