AMD Radeon HD 6850 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6850 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6850
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 39% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 37.2 GTexel / s versus 26.7 billion / sec
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 352
- Environ 74% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,488.0 gflops versus 855.4 gflops
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 127 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 versus 741.303
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.609 versus 24.513
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.45 versus 64.492
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3489 versus 2999
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3660
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 3321
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3489 versus 2999
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3660
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 3321
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 October 2010 versus 31 May 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.2 GTexel / s versus 26.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 960 versus 352 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,488.0 gflops versus 855.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 127 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 versus 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.609 versus 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.45 versus 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3489 versus 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3489 versus 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2650 versus 1965
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 versus 432
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.079 versus 13.033
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.516 versus 1.333
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2650 versus 1965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 versus 432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 versus 13.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 versus 1.333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6850
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1965 | 2650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | 441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.033 | 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 | 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.333 | 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.609 | 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.45 | 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3489 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3489 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3321 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9276 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6850 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Barts | GF100 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 21 October 2010 | 31 May 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $279 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 840 | 842 |
Prix maintenant | $99.99 | $263.28 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.63 | 12.73 |
Infos techniques |
||
Performance á point flottant | 1,488.0 gflops | 855.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 352 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 37.2 GTexel / s | 26.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 127 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,700 million | 3,100 million |
Performance de Compute | 30x | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 352 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | AGP | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 198 mm | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | Two 6-pins |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB / s | 102.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |