AMD FirePro V7900 versus AMD Radeon HD 6850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro V7900 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro V7900
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 58.0 GTexel / s versus 37.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 960
- Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,856.0 gflops versus 1,488.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2254 versus 1953
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.134 versus 13.033
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.678 versus 32.609
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 versus 139.45
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 24 May 2011 versus 21 October 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.0 GTexel / s versus 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 960 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,856.0 gflops versus 1,488.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2254 versus 1953 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.134 versus 13.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.678 versus 32.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.25 versus 139.45 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3348 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6850
- Environ 19% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 127 Watt versus 151 Watt
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 versus 340
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 versus 676.409
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.333 versus 1.309
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3489 versus 2996
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3489 versus 2996
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 127 Watt versus 151 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 versus 340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 versus 676.409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.333 versus 1.309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3489 versus 2996 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3489 versus 2996 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V7900
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD FirePro V7900 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2254 | 1953 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 434 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.134 | 13.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 676.409 | 946.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.309 | 1.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.678 | 32.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.25 | 139.45 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2996 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2996 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD FirePro V7900 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Cayman | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 24 May 2011 | 21 October 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 825 | 826 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Prix maintenant | $99.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.63 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,856.0 gflops | 1,488.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.0 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | 127 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,640 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | AGP |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 279 mm | 198 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD FirePro V7900 avec des autres
AMDFirePro V7900 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4330
AMDFirePro V7900 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 465
AMDFirePro V7900 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850
AMDFirePro V7900 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
AMDFirePro V7900 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
AMDFirePro V7900 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
