NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 versus AMD Radeon HD 6850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 and AMD Radeon HD 6850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.6 GTexel / s versus 37.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.161 versus 13.033
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.125 versus 1.333
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 versus 32.609
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3537 versus 3489
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3537 versus 3489
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 24 September 2011 versus 21 October 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.6 GTexel / s versus 37.2 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 versus 13.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 versus 1.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 versus 32.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 versus 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 versus 3489 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6850
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 336
- Environ 42% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,488.0 gflops versus 1,045.6 gflops
- Environ 26% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 127 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1965 versus 1872
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 versus 418
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 versus 781.734
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.45 versus 75.212
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3398
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 3117
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3398
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 3117
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 960 versus 336 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,488.0 gflops versus 1,045.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 127 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1965 versus 1872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 versus 418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 versus 781.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.45 versus 75.212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3117 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1872 | 1965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 432 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 | 13.033 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 | 946.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 | 1.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 | 32.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 | 139.45 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 | 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3398 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 | 3489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3398 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF114 | Barts |
Date de sortie | 24 September 2011 | 21 October 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $179 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 839 | 840 |
Prix maintenant | $199.99 | $99.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.01 | 28.63 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 778 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,488.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.6 GTexel / s | 37.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 127 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 210 mm | 198 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | AGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.2 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |