AMD Radeon HD 6870 versus ATI Radeon HD 5870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6870 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6870
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 900 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 151 Watt versus 188 Watt
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4950 versus 1858
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.514 versus 43.496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 versus 3671
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 versus 3671
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 October 2010 versus 23 September 2009 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt versus 188 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2208 versus 2199 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4950 versus 1858 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 versus 43.496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 3671 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5870
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 68.0 GTexel / s versus 50.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 1600 versus 1120
- Environ 35% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,720.0 gflops versus 2,016.0 gflops
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.789 versus 16.41
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 versus 857.798
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.775 versus 1.346
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 versus 184.41
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 versus 4238
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 versus 4238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.0 GTexel / s versus 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1600 versus 1120 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,720.0 gflops versus 2,016.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.789 versus 16.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 versus 857.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.775 versus 1.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 versus 184.41 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 versus 4238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 versus 4238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6870
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2208 | 2199 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4950 | 1858 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.41 | 18.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 | 1339.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.346 | 1.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 | 43.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 | 245.813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 6870 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Barts | Cypress |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 21 October 2010 | 23 September 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $239 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 812 | 770 |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 38.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,016.0 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1120 | 1600 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt | 188 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,700 million | 2,154 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 220 mm | 282 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 134.4 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 6870 avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 6870 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX Go1400
AMDRadeon HD 6870 vs
ATIRadeon X550 XT
AMDRadeon HD 6870 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3600M
AMDRadeon HD 6870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 6870 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
AMDRadeon HD 6870 vs
AMDFirePro M4100
