AMD Radeon HD 6970M versus NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6970M and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6970M
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 680 MHz versus 574 MHz
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 32.6 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 448
- Environ 27% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,305.6 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 204 Watt
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3600 MHz versus 2988 MHz
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 versus 446
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.801 versus 90.839
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 680 MHz versus 574 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.6 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 versus 448 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,305.6 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 204 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz versus 2988 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 versus 446 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.801 versus 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 versus 3335 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2685 versus 2270
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9850 versus 3349
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.377 versus 4.787
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.755 versus 617.819
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.66 versus 0.927
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.891 versus 24.456
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3689 versus 3229
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3689 versus 3229
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2685 versus 2270 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9850 versus 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.377 versus 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.755 versus 617.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.66 versus 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 versus 24.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 versus 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 versus 3229 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6970M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6970M | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2270 | 2685 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 | 446 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3349 | 9850 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.787 | 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.819 | 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.927 | 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.456 | 34.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.801 | 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3229 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3229 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3501 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3501 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6970M | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Blackcomb | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 4 January 2011 | 10 December 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 791 | 792 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4,399 | |
Prix maintenant | $332.21 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.86 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 680 MHz | 574 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,305.6 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 448 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.6 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 204 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,700 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 248 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 143.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |