NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 versus AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 and AMD Radeon HD 6970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 79% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 680 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 77.7 billion / sec versus 32.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 960
- Environ 91% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 1,244.2 gflops versus 1,305.6 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) versus 1 GB
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 versus 2270
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 versus 3349
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 versus 4.787
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 versus 617.819
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 versus 0.927
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 versus 24.456
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3229
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3229
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 24 March 2011 versus 4 January 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 680 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.7 billion / sec versus 32.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 960 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 1,244.2 gflops versus 1,305.6 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 versus 2270 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 versus 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 versus 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 versus 617.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 versus 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 versus 24.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3229 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6970M
- 4.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 365 Watt
- 2.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3600 MHz versus 1707 MHz
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 versus 394
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 117.801 versus 107.239
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 365 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz versus 1707 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 versus 394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 117.801 versus 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 versus 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 versus 3330 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | AMD Radeon HD 6970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | 2270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 656 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 | 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 | 4.787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 | 617.819 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 | 0.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 | 24.456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 | 117.801 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3342 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | AMD Radeon HD 6970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF110 | Blackcomb |
Date de sortie | 24 March 2011 | 4 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 789 | 790 |
Prix maintenant | $184 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz | 680 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 1,244.2 gflops | 1,305.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 960 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.7 billion / sec | 32.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 365 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
Options SLI | Quad | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | None |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 327.7 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1707 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |