AMD Radeon HD 7570 versus AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7570 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 78% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 614 versus 559
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 256 versus 218
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.874 versus 4.278
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 259.769 versus 255.525
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.487 versus 0.464
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.033 versus 13.633
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1389 versus 1296
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2724 versus 1044
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 2716
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1389 versus 1296
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2724 versus 1044
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 2716
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2012 versus 7 February 2011 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 versus 559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 versus 218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 versus 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 versus 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 versus 0.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 versus 13.633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 versus 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 versus 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 versus 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 versus 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 2716 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1561 versus 1550
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 versus 57.396
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 60 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1561 versus 1550 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 versus 57.396 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 | 559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 | 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1550 | 1561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 | 4.278 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 | 255.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 | 0.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 | 13.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 | 59.183 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7570 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Turks | Thames |
Date de sortie | 5 January 2012 | 7 February 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1254 | 1426 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 624 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 40 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 716 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 650 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |