AMD Radeon HD 7650M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7650M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7650M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 80% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 10.8 GTexel / s versus 6.0 billion / sec
- 5x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 96
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 432.0 gflops versus 192 gflops
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 23 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 440 versus 394
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 220.859 versus 162.162
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.624 versus 12.306
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1042 versus 737
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1949 versus 1731
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1042 versus 737
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1949 versus 1731
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2012 versus 3 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 GTexel / s versus 6.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 480 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 432.0 gflops versus 192 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 23 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 440 versus 394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 220.859 versus 162.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.624 versus 12.306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1042 versus 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1949 versus 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1042 versus 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1949 versus 1731 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 450 MHz
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 88 versus 57
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1583 versus 1192
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.329 versus 3.699
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.426 versus 0.375
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2906 versus 1733
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2906 versus 1733
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 450 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 88 versus 57 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1583 versus 1192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.329 versus 3.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.426 versus 0.375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2906 versus 1733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2906 versus 1733 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7650M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 440 | 394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 57 | 88 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1192 | 1583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.699 | 4.329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 220.859 | 162.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.375 | 0.426 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.624 | 12.306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1042 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1949 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1733 | 2906 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1042 | 737 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1949 | 1731 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1733 | 2906 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 680 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7650M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Thames | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2012 | 3 September 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1515 | 1516 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 550 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 450 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 432.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 GTexel / s | 6.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 23 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | (G)DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |