AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 192
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 768.0 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- Environ 76% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 66 Watt versus 116 Watt
- 3.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1026 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11715 versus 5750
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.832 versus 41.941
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3322
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3322
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2012 versus 15 March 2011 |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt versus 116 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1026 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11715 versus 5750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.832 versus 41.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3322 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 50% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.8 billion / sec versus 19.2 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 versus 804
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 versus 324
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 versus 7.266
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.125 versus 0.464
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 versus 1366
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 versus 2385
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 versus 1366
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 versus 2385
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 billion / sec versus 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 versus 804 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 versus 324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 versus 7.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 versus 0.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 versus 1366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 versus 2385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 versus 1366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 versus 2385 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 804 | 1557 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 | 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11715 | 5750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.266 | 18.461 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | 1.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.832 | 41.941 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1366 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2385 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1366 | 2488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2385 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Turks | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 5 January 2012 | 15 March 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1103 | 1019 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $287.59 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 192 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s | 28.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt | 116 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 716 million | 1,170 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 8.25" (21 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 1026 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
