NVIDIA Quadro K2100M versus AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2100M and AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 32.02 GTexel / s versus 19.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 480
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 66 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 512 MB
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1359 versus 805
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.383 versus 7.266
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.107 versus 0.464
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 versus 1366
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 2385
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 versus 1366
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 2385
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 5 January 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.02 GTexel / s versus 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 576 versus 480 |
| Performance á point flottant | 768.4 gflops versus 768.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 66 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 512 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1359 versus 805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 versus 7.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 versus 0.464 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 versus 1366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 versus 2385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 versus 1366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 versus 2385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
- Environ 20% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 667 MHz
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 3008 MHz
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 versus 283
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11715 versus 4544
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.832 versus 40.703
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 667 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 3008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 versus 283 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11715 versus 4544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.832 versus 40.703 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1359 | 805 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 283 | 330 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4544 | 11715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.383 | 7.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 358.892 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.107 | 0.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.703 | 71.832 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | 1366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3605 | 2385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | 1366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3605 | 2385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K2100M | AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK106 | Turks |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 5 January 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $84.95 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1108 | 1109 |
| Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 667 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 768.4 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.02 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 66 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.0 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K2100M avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5770
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M vs
ATIFirePro V4800
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M vs
AMDRadeon R7 250
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX
