AMD Radeon HD 7670M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7670M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7670M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 480 versus 144
- Environ 48% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 576.0 gflops versus 388.8 gflops
- Environ 75% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1228 versus 1134
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 versus 2827
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1228 versus 1134
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 versus 2827
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 February 2012 versus 27 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 480 versus 144 |
Performance á point flottant | 576.0 gflops versus 388.8 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1228 versus 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 2827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1228 versus 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 2827 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 653 versus 470
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 110 versus 85
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2903 versus 1405
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.699 versus 2.47
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 versus 210.901
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 versus 2194
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 versus 2194
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 653 versus 470 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 110 versus 85 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2903 versus 1405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.699 versus 2.47 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 versus 210.901 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 versus 2194 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 versus 2194 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7670M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 470 | 653 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 85 | 110 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1405 | 2903 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.47 | 7.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.901 | 252.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1228 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2194 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 2827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1228 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2194 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 2827 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.727 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7670M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Thames | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 17 February 2012 | 27 October 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $629.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1421 | 1422 |
Prix maintenant | $629.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 576.0 gflops | 388.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 144 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 716 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, (GDDR5) | DDR3\DDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |