AMD Radeon HD 7750 versus NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7750 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.6 GTexel / s versus 20 GTexel / s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 192
- Environ 71% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 480.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1693 versus 976
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 versus 323
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 versus 11.122
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 versus 320.57
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 versus 12.67
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 versus 31.168
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 February 2012 versus 5 October 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s versus 20 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 480.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1693 versus 976 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 versus 323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 versus 11.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 versus 320.57 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 versus 12.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 versus 31.168 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- Environ 21% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 62 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2600 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1453 versus 305
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3447 versus 1439
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3295
- 4.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1453 versus 305
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3447 versus 1439
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3295
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2600 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 versus 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 versus 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 versus 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 versus 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3295 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1693 | 976 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | 323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 | 11.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 | 320.57 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 | 12.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 | 31.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | 1453 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 | 3447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | 1453 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 | 3447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3930 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | GF106 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 15 February 2012 | 5 October 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1136 | 1137 |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $209 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | 7.27 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 62 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 625 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 168 mm | 178 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | 41.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync |