AMD Radeon HD 7750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 7750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.6 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 192
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 601.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 41% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 106 Watt
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1698 versus 1317
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 versus 304
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 versus 14.758
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 versus 302.509
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 versus 0.965
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 versus 14.925
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 versus 27.656
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 February 2012 versus 13 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 512 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 106 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1698 versus 1317 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 versus 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 versus 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 versus 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 versus 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 versus 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 versus 27.656 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1125 MHz
- 7.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2160 versus 305
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 1439
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 versus 3295
- 7.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2160 versus 305
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 1439
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 versus 3295
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1125 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 versus 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 versus 3295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 versus 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 1439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 versus 3295 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1698 | 1317 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 305 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 305 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4923 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 7750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | GF106 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 15 February 2012 | 13 September 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1142 | 1144 |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | $64.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | 26.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Stream Processors | 512 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 168 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | 57.7 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |