NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M versus AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M and AMD Radeon HD 7750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,009 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 78% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1720 versus 1703
- 9.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 versus 305
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 versus 1439
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 versus 3295
- 9.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 versus 305
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 versus 1439
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 versus 3295
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 versus 1703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 versus 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 versus 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 3295 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 800 MHz versus 657 MHz
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 versus 232
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 versus 15.673
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 versus 509.958
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 versus 1.512
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 versus 30.422
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 versus 53.992
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz versus 657 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 versus 232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 versus 15.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 versus 509.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 versus 1.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 versus 30.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 versus 53.992 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1720 | 1703 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 423 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5578 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.673 | 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 | 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.512 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 | 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.992 | 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3295 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK106 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1137 | 1138 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 657 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 657 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon E6760
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
NVIDIATesla M2090
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760M vs
AMDFirePro W5130M
