AMD Radeon HD 8670M versus AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8670M and AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 730 MHz
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 19.8 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 633.6 gflops versus 599.0 gflops
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 versus 277
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 versus 8 January 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.8 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 633.6 gflops versus 599.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 versus 277 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 780 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 942 versus 520
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5875 versus 5532
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.771 versus 6.559
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.896 versus 144.131
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.219 versus 0.952
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.949 versus 17.551
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.899 versus 71.696
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1759 versus 1039
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2540 versus 1783
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 2270
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1759 versus 1039
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2540 versus 1783
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 2270
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 942 versus 520 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5875 versus 5532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.771 versus 6.559 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.896 versus 144.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.219 versus 0.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.949 versus 17.551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 72.899 versus 71.696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1759 versus 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2540 versus 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 2270 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1759 versus 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2540 versus 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 2270 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 | 942 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 277 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 5875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.559 | 14.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.131 | 285.896 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 | 1.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 | 24.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 | 72.899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | 1759 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | 2540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 | 3355 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 8670M | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Mars | Oland |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 | 8 January 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1168 | 1170 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | 780 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 730 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 633.6 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.8 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |