AMD Radeon HD 8670M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8670M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 versus 244
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 versus 4258
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.551 versus 10.872
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 versus 13.423
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 versus 9 January 2013 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 versus 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 versus 4258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 versus 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 versus 13.423 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Environ 21% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 967 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 56% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.94 GTexel / s versus 19.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 742.7 gflops versus 633.6 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 versus 520
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 versus 7.005
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 251.09 versus 144.131
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.144 versus 0.952
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 versus 1039
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 versus 1783
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 2270
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 versus 1039
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 versus 1783
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 2270
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s versus 19.8 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops versus 633.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1330 versus 520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 versus 7.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 versus 144.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 versus 0.952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 versus 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 versus 1783 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 2270 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 versus 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 versus 1783 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 2270 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 | 1330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 4258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.005 | 15.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.131 | 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 | 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 | 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 | 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Mars | GK107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 | 9 January 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1171 | 1172 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 633.6 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.8 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon HD 8670M avec des autres
AMDRadeon HD 8670M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3400
AMDRadeon HD 8670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560M
AMDRadeon HD 8670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M
AMDRadeon HD 8670M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
AMDRadeon HD 8670M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M350
AMDRadeon HD 8670M vs
AMDRadeon R7 A360
