Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 versus AMD Radeon HD 8670M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon HD 8670M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1352 versus 520
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6548 versus 5532
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.485 versus 7.005
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 246.614 versus 144.131
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.888 versus 0.952
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.014 versus 17.551
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2306 versus 1039
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 versus 2270
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2306 versus 1039
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 versus 2270
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 January 2017 versus 1 March 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1352 versus 520 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6548 versus 5532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 versus 7.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 versus 144.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 versus 0.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 versus 17.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 versus 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 2270 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 versus 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 2270 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- 2.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 8x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 48
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 versus 339
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 versus 42.981
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1783 versus 1514
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1783 versus 1514
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 48 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 versus 339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 versus 42.981 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 versus 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 versus 1514 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon HD 8670M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1352 | 520 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 488 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6548 | 5532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | 7.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | 144.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | 0.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | 17.551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | 71.696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 2270 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 2270 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT3e | Mars |
Date de sortie | 3 January 2017 | 1 March 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1170 | 1173 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 775 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 775 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Performance á point flottant | 633.6 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |