AMD Radeon HD 8670M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 8670M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8670M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 488 versus 295
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5532 versus 3766
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.952 versus 0.792
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.551 versus 14.637
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 71.696 versus 20.86
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 versus 5 June 2012 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 versus 295 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 versus 3766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 versus 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 versus 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 versus 20.86 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 902 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 46% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.86 GTexel / s versus 19.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 633.6 gflops
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1173 versus 520
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.448 versus 7.005
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.777 versus 144.131
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 versus 1039
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 versus 1783
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 versus 2270
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 versus 1039
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 versus 1783
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 versus 2270
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 902 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.86 GTexel / s versus 19.8 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 633.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1173 versus 520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.448 versus 7.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.777 versus 144.131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 versus 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 versus 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 versus 2270 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 versus 1039 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 versus 1783 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 versus 2270 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 520 | 1173 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 295 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5532 | 3766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.005 | 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 144.131 | 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.952 | 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.551 | 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 71.696 | 20.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1039 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1783 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2270 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1039 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1783 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2270 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 8670M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Mars | GK107 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 | 5 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1177 | 1178 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 902 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 633.6 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.8 GTexel / s | 28.86 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |