AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU versus AMD Radeon HD 6990
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and AMD Radeon HD 6990 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 69% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 830 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 300 Watt versus 375 Watt
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 versus 3014
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 versus 17.264
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 versus 840.452
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 versus 1.76
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 versus 53.903
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 versus 265.302
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 8 March 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 830 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt versus 375 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 versus 3014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 versus 17.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 versus 840.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 versus 1.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 versus 53.903 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 versus 265.302 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6990
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1704 MHz
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 371
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4562 versus 1715
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 1177
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 1724
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4562 versus 1715
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 1177
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 1724
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1704 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4562 versus 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4562 versus 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 1724 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD Radeon HD 6990 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 3014 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 532 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | 17.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | 840.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | 1.76 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | 53.903 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | 265.302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | 4562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | 4562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Nom de code | Vega 10 | Antilles |
Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 8 March 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 668 | 665 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz | 830 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 375 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 2,640 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,549.8 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 295 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 1704 MHz | 5000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 2x 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 256 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |