AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 versus AMD Radeon Pro 555
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and AMD Radeon Pro 555 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 18% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5100 MHz
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.134 versus 572.795
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.893 versus 2.83
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 versus 26.388
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 versus 4042
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 versus 2221
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 versus 4042
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 versus 2221
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5100 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 versus 572.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 versus 2.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 versus 26.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 versus 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 versus 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 versus 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 versus 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 555
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 40.8 GTexel / s versus 39.01 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- Environ 5% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,306 gflops versus 1,248 gflops
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 versus 2629
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 versus 432
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11524 versus 10611
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.301 versus 29.959
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 versus 122.245
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40.8 GTexel / s versus 39.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,306 gflops versus 1,248 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 versus 2629 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 versus 432 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11524 versus 10611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 versus 29.959 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 versus 122.245 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | AMD Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2629 | 3141 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | 659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10611 | 11524 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | 31.301 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | 572.795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | 2.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | 26.388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | 162.706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3349 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Lexa | Polaris 21 |
| Date de sortie | 12 June 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 704 | 705 |
| Genre | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1219 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,248 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.01 GTexel / s | 40.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,200 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 81.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5100 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 avec des autres
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415 OEM
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560D
