AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus AMD Radeon RX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon RX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1187 MHz versus 1090-1175 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1400 MHz versus 1200-1275 MHz
- Environ 51% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 81.60 GTexel/s
- Environ 38% de pipelines plus haut: 1408 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 versus 56.81
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 versus 775.281
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 versus 4.602
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 versus 64.428
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 versus 257.062
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 versus 6571
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 versus 6571
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 18 April 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz versus 1090-1175 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz versus 1200-1275 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s versus 81.60 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 1408 versus 1024 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 14 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 versus 56.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 versus 775.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 versus 4.602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 versus 64.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 versus 257.062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 versus 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 versus 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3352 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 560
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60-80 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 versus 3463
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60-80 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 56.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 775.281 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 4.602 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 64.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 257.062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 6571 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3647 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 494 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57671 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1803 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | Polaris 21 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $99 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 522 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Prix maintenant | $104.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 54.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1200-1275 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1090-1175 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 60-80 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 3,000 million |
| Unités de Compute | 14/16 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
| Texture Units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 170 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Largeur | Single-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
