AMD Radeon Pro W5500 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 250 Watt
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 23 July 2019 |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Environ 39% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 1187 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 3072 versus 1408
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 337.794 versus 130.7
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4566.815 versus 2361.73
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.631 versus 13.641
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.996 versus 135.462
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 versus 774.974
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3463
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 12184
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3463
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 1187 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 versus 1408 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 versus 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 versus 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 versus 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 versus 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 versus 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3463 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 337.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 4566.815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 31.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 190.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1654.321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 27179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 27179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19611 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 117339 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Nom de code | Navi 14 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 23 July 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 330 | 109 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1400 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1187 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6400 million | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Largeur | Single-slot | 2-Slot |
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro W5500 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
