AMD Radeon R2 Graphics versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 700 MHz versus 680 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 5.6 GTexel / s versus 5.44 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 128 versus 80
- Environ 65% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 179.2 gflops versus 108.8 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 55 nm
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 250 versus 149
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 67 versus 19
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1912 versus 1697
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1912 versus 1697
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 February 2015 versus 9 January 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz versus 680 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.6 GTexel / s versus 5.44 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 128 versus 80 |
| Performance á point flottant | 179.2 gflops versus 108.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 55 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 versus 149 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 67 versus 19 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 versus 1697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 versus 1697 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 | 149 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 67 | 19 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.751 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.263 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.299 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | 1697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 | 1697 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Nom de code | Beema | M92 |
| Date de sortie | 27 February 2015 | 9 January 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1589 | 1629 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 179.2 gflops | 108.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 80 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.6 GTexel / s | 5.44 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 930 million | 242 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-II |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
| RAM maximale | 512 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
| 1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
| DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
| HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R2 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6600 GT
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GT
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
ATIRadeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R5 220 OEM
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720
