AMD Radeon R5 M335 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 M335 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M335
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 49% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1070 MHz versus 720 MHz
- Environ 41% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1070 MHz versus 758 MHz
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 577 versus 345
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 October 2015 versus 4 June 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1070 MHz versus 720 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1070 MHz versus 758 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 versus 345 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 80.6 billion / sec versus 21.4 GTexel / s
- 4.2x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 320
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,038 gflops versus 684.8 gflops
- Environ 64% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 5.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3252 versus 549
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9400 versus 4668
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 versus 14.536
- 7.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 versus 120.354
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 versus 1080
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2409 versus 1114
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3111 versus 1716
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 versus 1080
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2409 versus 1114
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3111 versus 1716
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.6 billion / sec versus 21.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops versus 684.8 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3252 versus 549 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9400 versus 4668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 versus 14.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 versus 120.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 versus 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 versus 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3111 versus 1716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 versus 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 versus 1114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3111 versus 1716 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 M335
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 549 | 3252 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | 345 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4668 | 9400 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.536 | 28.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 120.354 | 879.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 | 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1114 | 2409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1716 | 3111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 | 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1114 | 2409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1716 | 3111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 M335 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Exo | GK104 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 21 October 2015 | 4 June 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1045 | 1048 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1070 MHz | 758 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 5 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1070 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 684.8 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.4 GTexel / s | 80.6 billion / sec |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1100 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R5 M335 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGRID K160Q
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
IntelHD Graphics P630
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 655
AMDRadeon R5 M335 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX130
