AMD Radeon R7 350 versus AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 350 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 versus 506.712
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 versus 506.712 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- Environ 56% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 40 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 512
- Environ 56% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,280 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 versus 7787
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.836 versus 25.508
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.01 versus 2.72
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.787 versus 44.6
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 153.657 versus 109.558
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3707 versus 2072
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 versus 3122
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 versus 3358
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3707 versus 2072
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 versus 3122
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 versus 3358
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 40 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,280 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 versus 7787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.836 versus 25.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.01 versus 2.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.787 versus 44.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 153.657 versus 109.558 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3707 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 versus 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3707 versus 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 versus 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 350 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | 14263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | 33.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 506.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | 3.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 49.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 153.657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 14630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 14630 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2174 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 711 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1083 | 557 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 1,280 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 40 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,500 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 210 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 350 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
