AMD Radeon R7 350 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 350
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 900x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 647.813 versus 639.427
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.72 versus 2.341
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.6 versus 32
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 109.558 versus 69.814
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 versus 18 February 2014 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 versus 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 versus 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 versus 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 versus 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 36% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,111 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 versus 7787
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 versus 25.508
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 versus 2072
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 3122
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 versus 2072
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 3122
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 versus 7787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 versus 25.508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 versus 2072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 versus 2072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3122 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3346 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 6 July 2016 | 18 February 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1083 | 724 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119 | |
Prix maintenant | $150.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 168 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |