AMD Radeon R7 360 versus AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD Radeon R6 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 600 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 50.4 GTexel / s versus 15.72 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 3.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,613 gflops versus 503.0 gflops
- 5.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3140 versus 616
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 versus 137
- 4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16200 versus 4083
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 versus 11.201
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 versus 224.132
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 versus 0.942
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 versus 19.267
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 versus 45.165
- 5.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 versus 860
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 versus 1784
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3182
- 5.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 versus 860
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 versus 1784
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3182
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 17 September 2014 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s versus 15.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops versus 503.0 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3140 versus 616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 versus 137 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 versus 4083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 versus 11.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 versus 224.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 versus 0.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 versus 19.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 versus 45.165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 versus 860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 versus 1784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 versus 860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 versus 1784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3182 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
- 6.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3140 | 616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | 137 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 | 4083 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | 11.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | 224.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | 0.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | 19.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | 45.165 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | 860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 1784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | 860 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 1784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3182 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Tobago | Spectre |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 17 September 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 601 | 1403 |
Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops | 503.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s | 15.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,410 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 533 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Longeur | 165 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |