AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM versus AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.6 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 947.2 gflops versus 819.2 gflops
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1901 versus 1693
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 versus 427
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.788 versus 21.658
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.196 versus 566.052
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.619 versus 2.182
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 versus 37.143
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 versus 98.126
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2809 versus 305
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 versus 1439
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3295
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2809 versus 305
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 versus 1439
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3295
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops versus 819.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 versus 1693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 versus 427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 versus 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 versus 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 versus 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 versus 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 versus 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 versus 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 versus 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3295 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 1693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 427 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3295 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 764 | 1128 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 1,500 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
ATIMobility FireGL V3200
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3450
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
