AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7750
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM und AMD Radeon HD 7750 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 16% höhere Texturfüllrate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s
- Etwa 16% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 947.2 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
- Etwa 15% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 4x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 4500 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1901 vs 1693
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 427
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.788 vs 21.658
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 638.196 vs 566.052
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.619 vs 2.182
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 vs 37.143
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 98.126
- 9.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2809 vs 305
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 1439
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3295
- 9.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2809 vs 305
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 1439
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3295
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 30 June 2016 vs 15 February 2012 |
| Texturfüllrate | 29.6 GTexel / s vs 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 947.2 gflops vs 819.2 gflops |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 4500 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 vs 1693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 vs 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 vs 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 vs 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 vs 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 vs 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 vs 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 vs 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3295 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 1693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 427 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3295 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Cape Verde |
| Startdatum | 30 June 2016 | 15 February 2012 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 764 | 1128 |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $149.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 925 MHz | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 947.2 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 | 512 |
| Texturfüllrate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,500 million | 1,500 million |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 800 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Länge | 168 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 72 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 4500 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||

