AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM versus AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and AMD Radeon R9 270X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 180 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 8 October 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 270X
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 84 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 512
- 2.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,688 gflops versus 947.2 gflops
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4869 versus 1901
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 versus 530
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.87 versus 24.788
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 versus 638.196
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.354 versus 2.619
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 versus 41.414
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 versus 112.347
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 versus 2809
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 versus 3666
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 versus 2809
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 versus 3666
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 84 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,688 gflops versus 947.2 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4869 versus 1901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 versus 530 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 versus 24.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 versus 638.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 versus 2.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 versus 41.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 versus 112.347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 versus 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 versus 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 versus 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 versus 3666 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 4869 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 613 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 1314.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 6.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 85.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 315.412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Cape Verde | Curacao |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 8 October 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 764 | 440 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Prix maintenant | $399 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,800 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |