AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM und AMD Radeon R9 270X Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- 2.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 65 Watt vs 180 Watt
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 30 June 2016 vs 8 October 2013 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 270X
- 2.8x mehr Texturfüllrate: 84 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1280 vs 512
- 2.8x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,688 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4869 vs 1901
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 vs 530
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.87 vs 24.788
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 vs 638.196
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.354 vs 2.619
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 vs 41.414
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 vs 112.347
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 vs 2809
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 3666
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 vs 2809
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 3666
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 84 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 vs 512 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,688 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4869 vs 1901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 vs 530 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 vs 24.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 vs 638.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 vs 2.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 vs 41.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 vs 112.347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 vs 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 vs 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 vs 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 vs 3666 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1901 | 4869 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 | 613 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9694 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 63.87 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 1314.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 6.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 85.21 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 315.412 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 8068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Cape Verde | Curacao |
Startdatum | 30 June 2016 | 8 October 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 764 | 440 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $199 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $399 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technische Info |
||
Kerntaktfrequenz | 925 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 947.2 gflops | 2,688 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 512 | 1280 |
Texturfüllrate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 84 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,500 million | 2,800 million |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1050 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 2 x 6-pin |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 72 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 4500 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |