AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 7570M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 758 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 37% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 16.46 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 526.8 gflops versus 480.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 20.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 1096
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.32 versus 3.109
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 201.006 versus 199.164
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.227 versus 0.333
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.26 versus 10.489
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 42.722
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 905
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 1797
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2352
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 7 January 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s versus 12 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops versus 480.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 1096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.32 versus 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 201.006 versus 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 versus 0.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.26 versus 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 42.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2352 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7570M
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 500 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 400 versus 384
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 13 Watt versus 15 Watt
- 27x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 905 versus 33.5
- 53x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1797 versus 33.9
- 39.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 versus 60
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 500 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 versus 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 905 versus 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1797 versus 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2352 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 7570M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 1096 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.32 | 3.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 201.006 | 199.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.227 | 0.333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.26 | 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 42.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1797 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 2352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 428 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 7570M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | Wani | Thames |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 7 January 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1467 | 1440 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 650 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 500 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 12 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 13 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 25.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |