AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 16.46 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 526.8 gflops versus 499.2 gflops
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 4936
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 13.569
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 versus 162.886
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 versus 1.009
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 versus 19.668
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 77.819
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 1119
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 1284
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2264
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 1 November 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops versus 499.2 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 4936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 13.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 versus 162.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 versus 1.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 versus 19.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 77.819 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2264 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 730 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 780 MHz versus 758 MHz
- 33.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 versus 33.5
- 37.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 versus 33.9
- 37.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 versus 60
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz versus 200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz versus 758 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 versus 33.5 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 versus 33.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 4936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 13.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 162.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 1.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 19.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 77.819 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 2264 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 548 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Wani | Oland |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 1 November 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1435 | 1406 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 780 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 730 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 168 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz |