AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 9.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 140 Watt
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 11364
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 62.69
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 versus 1307
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 62.69 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 versus 1307 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 4.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 200 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1033 MHz versus 758 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 78.4 billion / sec versus 16.46 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- 3.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 526.8 gflops
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 versus 15.145
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 206.354
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 1.2
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 24.15
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 1979
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 2101
- 106.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 33.5
- 108.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 33.9
- 56.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 60
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz versus 758 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec versus 16.46 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 526.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 versus 15.145 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 206.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 1.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 24.15 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 2101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 1307 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Wani | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1435 | 740 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
ATIRadeon 7200
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Go
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics vs
IntelHD Graphics 515
