AMD Radeon R7 M370 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 M370

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M370

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 225
Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 versus 388.248

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	5 May 2015 versus 12 March 2014
Taille de mémore maximale	4 GB versus 2 GB
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	676 versus 225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	476.075 versus 388.248

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Environ 57% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 23.04 GTexel / s
Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
Environ 57% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 737.3 gflops
Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2506 versus 1418
Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9790 versus 6968
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 17.26
Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 1.653
Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 30.082
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 70.174
2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 1747
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 1484
Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2449
2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 1747
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 1484
Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2449

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	36.08 GTexel / s versus 23.04 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	1,155 gflops versus 737.3 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2506 versus 1418
Geekbench - OpenCL	9790 versus 6968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	37.761 versus 17.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.428 versus 1.653
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	38.889 versus 30.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	151.016 versus 70.174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3817 versus 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 versus 1484
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 versus 2449
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3817 versus 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 versus 1484
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 versus 2449

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1418

2506

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

676

225

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6968

9790

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

17.26

37.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

476.075

388.248

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.653

2.428

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.082

38.889

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

70.174

151.016

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1747

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1484

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2449

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1747

3817

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1484

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2449

3353

Nom	AMD Radeon R7 M370	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1418	2506
PassMark - G2D Mark	676	225
Geekbench - OpenCL	6968	9790
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	17.26	37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	476.075	388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.653	2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.082	38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.174	151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1747	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1484	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2449	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1747	3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1484	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2449	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		979

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon R7 M370	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Nom de code	Litho	GM107
Conception	AMD Radeon R7 300 Series
Date de sortie	5 May 2015	12 March 2014
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	929	930
Genre	Desktop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	960 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	900 MHz
Performance á point flottant	737.3 gflops	1,155 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	640
Taux de remplissage de la texture	23.04 GTexel / s	36.08 GTexel / s
Compte de transistor	1,040 million	1,870 million
Noyaux CUDA		640
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		45 Watt
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)		Up to 3840x2160
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2		Up to 3840x2160
Protection du contenu HDCP
HDMI
Support du signale LVDS		Up to 1920x1200
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop	medium sized	medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	73.6 GB / s	80.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Configuration standard de la mémoire		DDR3 or GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Graphiques changeables
Zero Core
ZeroCore
3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA