AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R7 M370 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 M370
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 225
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 vs 388.248
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 5 May 2015 vs 12 March 2014 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 vs 388.248 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Etwa 57% höhere Texturfüllrate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s
- Etwa 67% höhere Leitungssysteme: 640 vs 384
- Etwa 57% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,155 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2506 vs 1418
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9777 vs 6968
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 17.26
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 1.653
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 30.082
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 70.174
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 1747
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1484
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2449
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 1747
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1484
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2449
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 36.08 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 640 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,155 gflops vs 737.3 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2506 vs 1418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9777 vs 6968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 vs 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 vs 1.653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 vs 30.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 vs 70.174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2449 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1418 | 2506 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 225 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6968 | 9777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 | 37.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 | 388.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.653 | 2.428 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 | 38.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 | 151.016 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | 3817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1484 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2449 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | 3817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1484 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2449 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R7 M370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Codename | Litho | GM107 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Startdatum | 5 May 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 929 | 930 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 960 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 900 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 737.3 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 640 |
Texturfüllrate | 23.04 GTexel / s | 36.08 GTexel / s |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
CUDA-Kerne | 640 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
7.1-Kanal HD-Audio auf HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP-Inhaltsschutz | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung von LVDS-Signalen | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD und DTS-HD Audio Bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | medium sized |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 73.6 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Standard-Speicherkonfiguration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |