AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile versus AMD Radeon R7 M370
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile and AMD Radeon R7 M370 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 960 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52 GTexel / s versus 23.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,664 gflops versus 737.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1635 versus 1418
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10237 versus 6978
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.977 versus 17.26
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.177 versus 1.653
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.847 versus 30.082
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 167.399 versus 70.174
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2315 versus 1747
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3162 versus 1484
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 2449
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2315 versus 1747
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3162 versus 1484
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 2449
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 versus 5 May 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 960 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52 GTexel / s versus 23.04 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,664 gflops versus 737.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1635 versus 1418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10237 versus 6978 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 versus 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 versus 1.653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 versus 30.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 versus 70.174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 versus 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 versus 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 versus 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 versus 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 2449 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M370
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 256 MB
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 375
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 versus 309.874
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 256 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 375 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 versus 309.874 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 M370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1635 | 1418 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 375 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10237 | 6978 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.977 | 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.874 | 476.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.177 | 1.653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.847 | 30.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 167.399 | 70.174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2315 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3162 | 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2315 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3162 | 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 2449 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Raven | Litho |
Date de sortie | 26 October 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 947 | 948 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 960 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,664 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52 GTexel / s | 23.04 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 256 MB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |