AMD Radeon R9 380 versus AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 380 and AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 108.6 GTexel / s versus 80 GTexel / s
- Environ 40% de pipelines plus haut: 1792 versus 1280
- Environ 36% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,476 gflops versus 2,560 gflops
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 190 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6081 versus 4604
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 versus 586
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.135 versus 55.446
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1503.633 versus 952.668
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7635 versus 6821
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7635 versus 6821
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2791 versus 1651
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 5 March 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.6 GTexel / s versus 80 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,476 gflops versus 2,560 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6081 versus 4604 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 versus 586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 versus 55.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 versus 952.668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 versus 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 versus 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 versus 1651 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 24% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1200 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77430 versus 76397
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 970 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1200 MHz versus 970 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77430 versus 76397 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 380 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6081 | 4604 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 | 586 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 | 77430 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | 55.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | 952.668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 | 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 | 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 | 1651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.68 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.456 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 294.215 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 380 | AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Antigua | Pitcairn |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 5 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $349 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 370 | 463 |
| Prix maintenant | $264.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,476 gflops | 2,560 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1280 |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | 1024 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.6 GTexel / s | 80 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 241 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 182.4 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 380 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
