AMD Radeon R9 380 versus AMD Radeon HD 7970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 380 and AMD Radeon HD 7970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 970 MHz versus 925 MHz
- Environ 58% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 190 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 versus 34541
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1503.633 versus 1390.592
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2791 versus 2276
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 22 December 2011 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 versus 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 versus 1390.592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 versus 2276 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7970
- Environ 9% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 118.4 GTexel / s versus 108.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1792
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,789 gflops versus 3,476 gflops
- Environ 42% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1375 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 84.413 versus 58.135
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9448 versus 7635
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9448 versus 7635
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s versus 108.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops versus 3,476 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1375 MHz versus 970 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 84.413 versus 58.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9448 versus 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9448 versus 7635 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 380 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6081 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 | 34541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | 84.413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | 1390.592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 | 9448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 | 2276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.336 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 101.929 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 481.76 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 380 | AMD Radeon HD 7970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Antigua | Tahiti |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 22 December 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $549 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 370 | 464 |
| Prix maintenant | $264.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,476 gflops | 3,789 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.6 GTexel / s | 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 274 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 182.4 GB/s | 264 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 380 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
