AMD Radeon R9 380 versus NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 380 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 970 MHz versus 902 MHz
- Environ 18% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 190 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 versus 537
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 76397 versus 24016
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz versus 902 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 versus 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 versus 24016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Environ 99% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 216.5 GTexel / s versus 108.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 61% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 1792
- Environ 49% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,196 gflops versus 3,476 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- 6.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 970 MHz
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8047 versus 6098
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.178 versus 58.135
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 versus 1503.633
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 versus 7635
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 versus 7635
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 216.5 GTexel / s versus 108.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,196 gflops versus 3,476 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 970 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8047 versus 6098 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.178 versus 58.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 versus 1503.633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 versus 7635 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 versus 7635 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 380 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6098 | 8047 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 | 24016 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | 67.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | 1816.61 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.435 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 355.166 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 380 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Antigua | GK110B |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $5,265 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 375 | 372 |
| Prix maintenant | $264.99 | $833.98 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 31.71 | 11.34 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 28 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,476 gflops | 5,196 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2880 |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.6 GTexel / s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 182.4 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 380 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
