AMD Radeon R9 390 versus AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 390 and AMD Radeon R3 Graphics pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 600 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 160.0 GTexel / s versus 4.8 GTexel / s
- 20x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 128
- 33.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,120 gflops versus 153.6 gflops
- 28.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8876 versus 310
- 8.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 versus 94
- 27.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 43778 versus 1568
- 36x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 120.267 versus 3.343
- 29.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 versus 106.771
- 31.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.097 versus 0.35
- 14.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.473 versus 8.234
- 27.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.381 versus 21.88
- 17.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10445 versus 587
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 750
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 1745
- 17.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10445 versus 587
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 750
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 1745
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 28 January 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 160.0 GTexel / s versus 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 128 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,120 gflops versus 153.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8876 versus 310 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 versus 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43778 versus 1568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 versus 3.343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 versus 106.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 versus 0.35 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 versus 8.234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 versus 21.88 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 versus 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 versus 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 1745 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
- 18.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 275 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 275 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 390 | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8876 | 310 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 94 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43778 | 1568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 | 3.343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 | 106.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 | 0.35 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | 8.234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 | 21.88 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 | 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 | 587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1745 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 955 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 390 | AMD Radeon R3 Graphics | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Grenada | Beema |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 28 January 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 312 | 1609 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Performance á point flottant | 5,120 gflops | 153.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 128 |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 160.0 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,200 million | 930 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 267 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Longeur | 275 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 384 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 512 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |